CLD Consulting Engineers, Inc.










Updates 







  Home




  About CLD




  Services




  News & Events




  Project Updates




  Portfolio




  Careers




  Resources




  Contact Us





Search this site








August 8, 2000 Meeting Minutes
Meeting One
 
Chair called the meeting to order at 5:15 PM, Tuesday August 8, 2000. Chair stated that CLD Consulting Engineers was present to discuss an approach to consensus building. He turned the meeting over to Charles Hirshberg, Project Manager from CLD, who introduced Tom Sommers, a Principal at CLD, who will be facilitating a consensus building process. Tom will attempt to bring a Stakeholders committee through the consensus building process, which is especially important given the controversy surrounding this project.
 
The Ad-Hoc committee wants to keep the general public informed of what is going on with the project; minutes will be distributed and available to the public.
 
Tonight’s meeting is to outline the facilitation process.
 
CLD provided an agenda for the meeting and for the continuing workshops. This was the subject of discussion for the remainder of this meeting.
 
Mission is what we (the committee) decide it is. Right now the Mission, as outlined in CLD’s handout, is based on the warrant article.
 
All meetings will be open to the public; however, discussion and votes will come from the Stakeholders Committee. It is imperative that all members of the committee attend all meetings.
 
Constraints:
 
Site has certain constraints which will be defined through this process.
 
From the Constraints and Goals we will develop Criteria to work with. We will weigh our potential designs against the Criteria. The Criteria will be established by what our goals are and what we want to do and agree on. Agreement does not mean that everyone agrees, rather that the majority of the consensus building group agrees on it. We can also establish our priorities based on the Criteria. As part of the process, we need to look at and follow the Criteria to make sure that they are correct.
 
We will evaluate design concepts based on the Criteria in order to develop a “final concept” with a cost estimate tied to it.
 
Ground Rules:
 
Ground Rules for interaction through the workshop were recommended by CLD.
 
The Ground Rules are essentially about courtesy and to ensure that everyone is heard. Courtesy can be hard to come by when dealing with contentious issues. It is important that we stay on track.
 
We need to hear from everyone honestly.
 
Part of the process is making sure that we speak about things when it’s appropriate to do so. We need to stay on track.
 
We are in this together and have a collective responsibility. When a consensus is not clear, the committee will vote either openly or by ballot. This is true for all issues, not just the final product.
 
One person should speak at a time.
 
We hope that people will develop trust in the process.
 
We should have fun and a sense of humor through the process.
 
No speeches, please; we should try to observe the “30 Second Rule”.
 
Spelling doesn’t count.
 
Meetings should not last longer than two hours.
 
CLD will prepare the agenda for each workshop.
 
Minutes will be sent to people via email or US mail (if they provide their address).
 
The Stakeholders Committee:
 
The Stakeholders Committee is a group of concerned citizens, representing various interests, who will participate fully in the workshop.
 
It is the responsibility of the Ad-Hoc Committee to decide on the participants.
 
Must be a small group (15-20 people).
 
Participants must commit their presence to all meetings.
 
There should be a reasonably broad representation of views on the committee.
 
The general public will have a chance to speak at one of the meetings. They can also speak with people on the committee about their views.
 
We should have representatives from each set of stakeholders, i.e. abutters, business people, etc.
 
The Chair asked people to identify themselves if they were interested in serving on the committee. The following persons were selected to participate as Stakeholders.
 
Jack Daggitt - Conservation Commission (as an abutter)
 
Sol Baumrind - Abutter (farm)
 
Gerry Griffin - Stowe Landtrust/Interested Party/Not an abutter or Business owner
 
Bruce Noujan - Stowe Area Association
 
Dick Marron - Chair of Ad-Hoc Committee/Selectboard
 
Christopher Francis - Stowe Area Association
 
Lillian Zuber - Stowe Tomorrow (Concerned with the future of Stowe)
 
Eric Zeikel - Friends of the Mayo Farm
 
Marion Kellogg - Ripple Stream/Stream Protection (questionable due to schedule)
 
Virginia (Chris) Wood - Stowe Historical Society
 
Donna Wheeler - Open, broad minded & fair person
 
Scott Dunn - Town Administrator
 
Gar Anderson - Cemetery Commission
 
Sonny Davis - Lifelong Resident of Stowe
 
Peg Guerra - Abutter
 
Evelyn Frey - Abutter
 
Donna Higgins - Abutter
 
Would like to set up 5 meetings, six would be fine.
 
“If we can get through pieces of this then you will see how this starts to come together with the overall process.” Tom Sommers
 
The Format:
 
Five to six workshop meetings.
 
The schedule of the first four are:
 
August 29, 2000  5:00 P.M.
 
September 19, 2000  5:00 P.M.
 
October 3, 2000  5:00 P.M.
 
October 17, 2000  5:00 P.M.
 
The discussion at meetings is scheduled as follows:
 
Meeting Two
  • Define Mission.
  • Suggest that we start with the warrant article, which reads:
  • “ Will the Town in Town Meeting authorize the relocation of the Mayo Farm Community Events Field from its current location to the field to the south of the Mayo Farm Road bound by the West Branch of the Little River and West Hill Road, provided that approval be conditioned upon the following items: (1) the Town will be subject to applicable land use permit processes; (2) the current use of the existing events fields by the Recreation Department for youth athletic activities shall remain unchanged; and (3) the so-called Polo Field shall revert back to agricultural use?
  • Develop Goals: These are refined from the Mission.
  • Some possibilities are:
  • Maintain property as pristine agricultural land. Allow limited use of the property for event purposes during limited times of the year without substantial disruption to site. Allow for limited use with some permanent modification for events.
  • Allow significant modification to site.
  • Maximum utilization of site.
  • Act 250 Requirements must be strongly considered in the evaluation of Constraints.
Meeting Three
  • Set Criteria from Goals and Constraints.
  • Some examples are:
  • Environmental Buffers/Setbacks
  • Access Locations
  • Site Parking
  • Concessions
  • Utility Demand/Lighting
  • Signage
  • Mitigation of Visual & Noise Impact
  • Traffic
  • Time of Operation
  • Site Disturbance (Permanent)
  • Temporary Disturbance During Events
  • Type of Event/Use
  • Costs/Budget (Permanent)
These Criteria will be used to judge the concepts which will be presented in Meeting Four.
 
The Criteria should be prioritized into most important to least important categories.
 
Develop design concept ideas for the CLD Team to use to prepare conceptual plans for Meeting Four.
 
Meeting Four
  • The CLD Team will present design Concepts three to four.
  • The Workshop Committee will comment, change and work toward a final concept which will be the basis for the Master Plan.
  • The Workshop Committee will also work towards a list of Criteria to be made part of the Master Plan.
Meeting Five
  • This will be the hearing to review the committee’s findings with the public.
  • Other Discussion
  • Where should the list of potential uses be defined?
  • This probably fits under goals.
  • This process assumes that ideas, concerns, and discussion by Stakeholders will be considered with appropriate data/reasons related to the site. i.e. to say “I want something or “I don’t want something” without data/reason to support it should not be given high consideration.
  • It was agreed that a list of the potential events for this site will be provided by the Ad-Hoc Committee for discussion (as part of the Goals) at the next meeting.
  • This list is based on events currently occurring in Stowe.
  • The Stakeholders Committee in this process decides on the Mission, the Goals, the Constraints, the Criteria, and ultimately, the Master Plan. The CLD Consulting Teams provide technical expertise on the site and off site impacts, provide ideas and designs to be considered, and facilitate the process.
  • The issue of a sludge disposal permit on some part of the property should be resolved soon. However, unless it is resolved, i.e. no longer part of the property, it needs to be considered as a Constraint in the process.
  • The CLD Team will provide detailed survey mapping of the site with Constraints shown for the next meeting.
  • The final product of this process will be the recommended Master Plan, put forth to the Town for vote. This Master Plan will include cost to construct/implement. The Master Plan is intended to be the position of the overall majority of the Stakeholders Workshop Committee.
  • There appeared to be agreement at the end of this first meeting that the process as described is worth dedicating effort to and that the Stakeholders selected will make all efforts to fully participate in it.
 
 
 


home | about | services | news | updates | portfolio | careers | resources | contact



CLD Consulting Engineers, Inc.
540 Commercial St., Manchester, NH 03101
p: 603.668.8223   f: 603.668.8802
e: info@cldengineers.com   w: www.cldengineers.com



© CLD Consulting Engineers, Inc., 2001.  All rights reserved.
Produced and powered by: Sitesurfer Publishing LLC